|| Replies ||

User	bigfineq | 2005-06-25 |
Subject	untitled
Message	I think he is "GUILTY"............famous people even from way back who were accused of sexual crimes hardly ever got convicted. He is a sick individual. This should be a wake-up call for parents. YOU CANNOT TRUST A PERSON WITH YOUR CHILD/CHILDREN just because they are: actors, singers, etc. I tell you, if his parents did place him in a situation knowing Michael is not wrapped to tight just for money, then all of them should share the same cell!

User	Rokhal | 2005-06-24 |
Subject	untitled
Message	I knew I had something better to say, and I just remembered. Maybe the jury couldn’t stand the idea of the mother coming out better than Jackson, because she was more despicable. It was relatively more just to not punish Jackson than for him to suffer and the mother go unhurt.

User	Rokhal | 2005-06-24 |
Subject	untitled
Message	It’s like the jury hated the mom so much they couldn’t convict and give her the satisfaction of ’winning.’ Trouble is, only money-grubbing mercenaries like her would let their kid near a wierdo like him.

User	WolfStar | 2005-06-24 |
Subject	untitled
Message	ah, don’t you just love america?

User	misty_of_moon | 2005-06-24 |
Subject	untitled
Message	that verdict was bullshit! there is no way you get accused a SECOND time for such a crime as that with all that evidence against you and get off on ALL charges, it was a scam if you ask me, you kow?, somebody’s bank account is probaly a lit larger now.

User	WolfStar | 2005-06-15 |
Subject	untitled
Message	If he’s sick, he needs to get help, and jail’s not gonna fix his problem. How about some serious therapy?

User	Winterbliss | 2005-06-14 |
Subject	untitled
Message	Granted he does need help and should keep away from the children for a while,but I always knew he was innocent, and I’m glad they found him as such. Like Wolfstar said, if he was a child molester he would have been a lot more discreet about it. I don’t think child molesters would openly admit thier fondness for children to the public if there was a sinster motive behind it. However, the sad thing about this whole thing to me, Michael Jackson will always be remembered for this case and not for all the good things he has done in his career. Another sad thing is the way that woman exploited her sick child, they should throw her ass in prison.

User	Star_searcher | 2005-06-14 |
Subject	untitled
Message	I think he is innocent, well he IS innocent. Yet there are still people going round accusing him. I though that was the point of a court of law?? To prove you to be innocent or guilty. If this was any "normal" person we would just accept the verdict but because it i Micheal Jackson his name will never be truly cleared. Is this justice? I have to say though, if I was on that jury I would not have convicted him, mainly because I would have feared my life. Some crazed fan would hunt you down and you know they would.

User	WolfStar | 2005-06-14 |
Subject	untitled
Message	why post this when you know there’s a live thread in the debate forum? well, it you want other opinions i guess. i think he’s sick and needs help, but i never thought that made him a child molester. i guess i never really thought he was guilty. i mean sure, the stuff he does is pretty damn suggestive, but look at him. he never had a childhood. he’s just reverted back trying to recapture it or whatever. he’s got a problem there, but i don’t think it’s sexual. but that’s just me. i mean, if he was really a pedophile, do you really think he couldn’t find more discreet ways to get it on? he’s MICHAEL JACKSON. there are a huge number of viable child prostitites in this world, sad as i am to admit that.