| User | Katia | | Topic | Number of Stalkers | | Message | I realise that I wouldnt be able to stalk ALL of the people I would want to ( for there are far too many), but 6 is just such a random number...I think 10 would be better, and would give more people to ’keep tabs’ on those whose writing they enjoy and look forward to...
So...if a significant number of people think the number could/should be increased to 10, please say so, and then maybe we can ask the webmaster?
Or are people happy with 6? |
|| Replies ||
| User | girly101 | 2007-01-21 | | | Subject | yep | | Message | i think we should be able to stalk more than 6 as well,i have more people than that id like to keep tabs on. |
| User | Twisted | 2006-12-26 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | Six is too little a number for me. I have broad horizons
|
| User | butterfly_chi5 | 2006-10-29 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | i never reallly understood the stauk part of this site. i had a few people, but then didnt knokow how to check them out. and then there are a few people who id like to check out, but dont want to click stauk. is there a way to remember what you read maybe? i donno. i think if you could watch more than 6 people it would be easier. |
| User | Toxic_Rayne | 2006-08-01 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | I am not happy with six...
*tox* |
| User | Lost Sheep | 2006-04-01 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | I think we should be able to stalk as many as we want. There are probably 20 people on this site that I would like to follow that only post a piece every couple of months. It would also be cool to stalk people who have left the site and might one day return. Stalking 50 inactive people takes no time at all and would be an effective way of knowing when someone is back. |
| User | joeyalphabet | 2006-02-21 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | Myabe you could step it up to eight and see what people say about that. |
| User | the insomniac | 2006-02-15 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | what the fuck is stalking and how do you do it..sounds fun!!do it in real life anyhow!no but really, does that mean i can check out faves from the site without searching for their posts..am v new??..x |
| User | unknown soldier | 2006-01-28 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | yeah i wish i could stalk more people too. |
| User | Brownsdelight | 2006-01-04 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | i think it should be ten as well.....there are too many people who i’m not able to catch their posts when they are fresh...... |
| User | mr. | 2005-07-17 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | I’m knew to the sight, but not too knew to find a thick bush with a view into a steamy bathroom window. Ten steamy windows with undressing silhouettes sounds much more appealing than six. You dirty little devils. |
| User | WolfStar | 2005-07-09 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | But stalking aint that simple. You have to devote your time to read EVERYTHING they put up. It comes with the job =) |
| User | alteredlife | 2005-07-07 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | Bookmark your fav’s through your interent browser. Easy way to get past the 6 limit.
The only thing is that you won’t get updates from these writers straight away, but hey.. |
| User | SHRINKSDR | 2005-07-04 | | | Subject | stalking | | Message | I’m new to this site and couldn’t figure out for the life of me what stalking meant, but wondered if there were any way of keeping a list of favorites that you could just click on to see what they were up to. So that what stalking is! As a Guy I don’t stalk other guys - so I found the term annoying. I agree 6 is too little. Ten is good! |
| User | SHRINKSDR | 2005-07-04 | | | Subject | stalking | | Message | I’m new to this site and couldn’t figure out for the life of me what stalking meant, but wondered if there were any way of keeping a list of favorites that you could just click on to see what they were up to. So that what stalking is! As a Guy I don’t stalk other guys - so I found the term annoying. I agree 6 is too little. Ten is good! |
| User | Ratiomeducet | 2005-07-03 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | What i mean by that is have a list you can have set up where you can click on the names of someone you are interested in.. crap im absolutely terrible at explaining this. |
| User | Ratiomeducet | 2005-07-01 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | I agree with Sandburg on this one. Maybe just implement a little thing where you can at least pm yourself with the link to someone youve found of interest. Stalk is such.. A commitment.. and men dont have time for those! :P |
| User | Sandburg | 2005-06-17 | | | Subject | druthers | | Message | I’d rather have a bookmarks or favorites list with unlimited entries but no notifications. WebDude didn’t like that idea at all. |
| User | magnicat | 2005-06-10 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | yum, that sounds tasty Graeme! perhaps some guac.. |
| User | wewak11 | 2005-06-09 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | I woud like a stalk of celery, and some cucmber raita to dip it in. Thanks... |
| User | WolfStar | 2005-06-09 | | | Subject | untitled | | Message | 10 seems like a lot of peolpe... i’m more the 1 or 2 at a timre type person.... You know, really keeping the focus on my chosen writer(s). But that’s just me. |
| | |
