| User | abuzzbuzz92 |
| Topic | Global Warming? |
| Message | Do any of you people actually think that we are doing enough for redcucing green house gases? We have reduced them by TWO% and we have to reduce them by FIFTY% if we want the ozone layer to recover with a few thousand years...
Many say that with the banning of green house gases, some fertilizers that help grow crop on un arable land will be banned... should we care about the food supplies right now where technology is less then what it will be in 30-50 years or should we care about the weather (which is also related to the food production) in the future ? What do you think? |
|| Replies ||
| User | abuzzbuzz92 | 2006-02-25 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | lol... all possible |
| User | kanu | 2006-02-25 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | Maybe that’s why they are interested in space travel so they can deposit there money on another planet when the earth becomes too environmentally unsound to store your money here. (But then they will probably get all paranoid about space aliens stealiong their money so they will use it as another excuse to pspend heaps of money on weapons) |
| User | kanu | 2006-02-25 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | It seems that people are getting rich by destroying the planet so they don’t really want to save the planet because they stand to lower their bank balance - ironic don’t you think? |
| User | Rokhal | 2006-02-25 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | The world just has to wait until enough people are so rich that taking care of the planet becomes the only need they haven’t fulfilled, and then they’re willing to shell out the money. And we do only have to wait; the world is getting richer every day.
Money is how anything gets done. Money pays for food, money pays for work. We can’t start spending it on the environment on a massive scale until the nations that pay for cleaning it up have that much wealth to throw into the air. Not that keeping the air clean isn’t important, just that the nations who are going to do the work have to be rich enough to actually do it. The air can wait a few decades. |
| User | kanu | 2006-02-25 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | Its pretty obvious how to unwind the clock but the trouble is that we are addicted to stupid habits and cannot hear. If we are still addicted to stupid habits (even after the next world war or global catastrophe) what’s the point? We will just recreate the same stupid situation |
| User | KimmyMim | 2006-02-25 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | Honestly...this is one small problem compared to the global problems as a whole. And...unfortunately, there’s nothing we can do about it. The ball started rolling generations ago. It’s been manipulated with greed and pride, among other things...with money in mind. Life on this planet is wound up too tight...like an over wound clock...one...more...click...catastrophe. No one knows how to loosen the wind. Man has dominated and ruled mankind to his injury. Divine intervention, perhaps just before we obliterate ourselves, is all that we can hope for.
Then...when the Great War is over...the one’s who are left over will begin gardening, and cleaning...and the Earth will refresh and renew. Did you know that if no one polluted for only one year, our planet would cleanse itself??? Isn’t that kewl. In just one year. Man...I can’t wait! |
| User | insphered soul | 2006-02-25 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | there is no such thing as global warming........
Chuck Norris got cold, so he turned the sun up there is no global warming |
| User | DarkenedSoul | 2006-02-25 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | Everybody know how a microwave works?Do you know that cell phones and satalites now use wicrowave emissions because they can be sent further with less distortion?Its pretty easy to see the world is becoming one giant microwave as we continually use more microwave emissions for comunication.I also read an interesting article on the N.A.S.A. website about a technology that creates a condition in the upper atmosphere (which usually allows microwaves to pass freely) that would allow them to reflect powerful targeted microwaves (originating from the surface) off the upper atmosphere and onto another location on the planets surface.The effect is a radius of a few miles is scorched by the microwave emissions.
A secondary cause is all the great glass buildings we build.In California researchers decided to see what would be the effect of puting gardens on top of all the buildings in a city block.They found that in that area the temperature was decreased by several degrees.It also saved on the buildings heating and cooling.Plants absorb rays from the sun which heat up the Earth and therefore the more square acrage that is devoid of plant life also helps to raise temperature.Worries about methane gasses produced by animals and humans alike wouldn’t be a problem if we simply used more methane for such things as lighters and gas grills. |
| User | kanu | 2006-02-25 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | I guess we would rather be 90% stupid rather than 100% stupid |
| User | Darth Zeus | 2006-02-25 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | Still, all bits help.
America should join the Kyoto protocol. or did they recently? not that i’m aware.. DZ |
| User | kanu | 2006-02-24 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | The race is on to claim the land released by the thawing of ice. An article in the New Zealand Herald describes the competition to claim the North Pole for its possible mineral and oil reserves and to control shipping traffic. A silver lining in every cloud?
Meanwhile the polar bear will be extinct within 100 years according to a BBC News report. New Zealand (in the extreme south) is experiencing a wet and cold summer with the anomalous appearance of icebergs released due to ice thawing at the South Pole. New coal plants planned for China, India and the US completely bury any gains from Kyoto Protocol greenhouse gas emission controls, according to this report in Christian Science Monitor. These 850 plants, scheduled to be online by 2012, will produce 5 times more greenhouse gases than the Kyoto Protocol will cut back. |
| User | abuzzbuzz92 | 2006-02-11 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | just wrote this to make it go on top and so ppl will reply
lol |
| User | abuzzbuzz92 | 2006-02-11 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | hope so |
| User | adnil | 2006-02-10 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | While have to do some serious thinking on this one cause a million different things come to mind,but I’ll get back to yeah soon on this adnil |
| User | Magnolia Steele | 2006-02-10 | |
| Subject | untitled |
| Message | That one is a tricky one. You watch all the movies with the doom of ozone depletion and it is scary to think it might happen if we don’t make quick and lasting changes. We need food to survive and food is in greater demand because we can afford it now. And the farmers make their living off of selling mass amounts of crops. If you slack on that, Farmers will suffer the most. If their was a way to match the prodcution naturally that would be great. You also got to factor in smog and plant gases also. Aslong as they are present, they to alter the ozone layer. I think the weather is just plain crazy by nature, but after last year and first part of this one...it does seem to be strange lately. I wish I could anwser that one for you.
Maggie |