|| Replies ||

User	XmaryjaneX | 2007-03-25 |
Subject	untitled
Message	mmmmph....i for one am not big on the "disipline"...considering the fact that i consider it my mortal enemy.......i would have to say curiosity...... although i do have to admit displine is a must in some situations.... but if there was no curiosity...there would be no need for disiplinetary action....so like i said im gonna side with curiosity...

User	silent_death12 | 2007-03-25 |
Subject	untitled
Message	well I agree with j.a.....but the point is (unless I’m way off here) to actually pick one; and its not supposed to be an easy choice...um, it depends; on a personal level? I’d have to say curiosity b/c it just leads to a lot more- inspiration, understanding...the desire to understand. but if we’re talking in schemes of everyone than probably discipline because some people can’t handle curiosity and no "channel" for it. =/ I still feel that’s not the best answer....mehs, w/e it’s an attempt; I just got up :(

User	joeyalphabet | 2007-03-25 |
Subject	untitled
Message	Both are equally important. Without curiosty no new theories would be developed, and without discipline none would ever be proen or disproven.