--Elite Writer Alias: lori_tab Name: Jazmine Swaim ASL: 19/f/alabama Bio: [ Quick Bio ] Website:[ Education ] Days Away: 9 Life Story: love, life, art, [ Ignore User ]
Favorites: 111 Forum Posts: 0 Shoutbox Posts: 1 RP Posts: 0 Signup Date: 1818 D 4.98 Years 0.5 Decades 60.6 Months 259.71 Weeks 1.818000e+8 Heart Beats -There you go eggman Quote: HOW ON EARTH ARE YOU EVER GOING TO EXPLAIN IN TERMS OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS SO IMPORTANT A BIOLOGICAL PHENOMENON AS LOVE? ALBERT EINSTEIN
"I think in art, but especially in films, people are trying to confirm their own existences."
Jim Morrison
Read this quote and it made me think of you.
Also, you do realize I gave you a critique on that already? Ahem:
"It's a strong piece, but not a powerful piece. Do you
understand what I mean? You express your point well and
with largely original words/wording, but I don't think
it has a lot of power to -do- something. Now I'm not
sure what I mean. I just sound pretentious now.
The piece is solid though I feel you have done better."
Reading it over, I realize there are some things about the critique I would change, but at least that part feels accurate to me.
Have you considered just being the one person there who isn't -trying- to make a point? I write because I enjoy it. It's fun.
Don't stress. Choose what you like.
My biggest problem with choosing: You aren't going to be the one reading it. And what good is something read by someone who doesn't feel it? That's a personal thing for me, I'm sure Mr. Fantastic will do wonderfully and fully understand and appreciate anything you've written more than you do : p
I would like to go for two reasons:
To see how your bit goes
and
to do my own.
J and J went off to play
out in the barn full of hay
they tossed much around
until one found
the other's needle was lost in the hay
Thanks for commenting on Einstein. Yes, the theory is that energy/matter cannot be destroyed or created but who knows that for sure? However, Einstein is about the transformation of light/energy to mass or mass to light/energy (E=MC2). The question posed is of whether the transformation is instant (nothing in between) It is proven that light acts as a wave when you are not looking at it and a particle when you are. Also light bends when traveling as around the sun. If we could see well enough, we would see not just a star here and there but stars everywhere. The light from each star must intersect and meet light from all directions. Who can imagine what effects happen in this ocean of light with strong tides at points near stars? Just because, for our purposes in our limited place in the cosmos, things work well with present theory doesn't mean present theory is correct to a greater understanding of physics with possible application we cannot imagine. Newton's physics worked wonders for generations past but could not predict accurately cosmic events or atomic events. Is there some understanding we do not have now coming in the future, or are we maxed out with our capabilities to go another step? Sorry for the long story, I just got carried away.
)
Currently Stalking: 
Last 20 Submissions
