Sign up to EliteSkills

Already have an account? Login to Roleplay.Cloud
Forgot password? Recover Password

Chaucer's Folly (A Valentine Tale?)

Author: jaycee
ASL Info:    44/F/ Texas
Elite Ratio:    5.27 - 2627 /1260 /188
Words: 157
Class/Type: Poetry /Misc
Total Views: 1962
Average Vote:    No vote yet.
Bytes: 1178


Chaucer is sometimes creditied with the romance of Valentine's Day when he wrote about King Richard II marriage on May 2, a day that commemorates a Bishop Valentines death in Genoa. This day was confused with the Catholic feast day that commemorates the martyr(s) St Valentine on February 14. This day is believed to be set to divert the pagan attention of the Romans who celebrated Lupercalia, a Greco-Roman festival for fertility.

*The Name Valentine comes from the latin that means Worthy.

Chaucer's Folly (A Valentine Tale?)

Oh Geoffrey!
Did you ken what confusions you'd cause?
A few simple lines to commemorate a royal wedding
On the feast day of a Genoan saint.
You and your raunchy humor
And bawdy thoughts
Of birds mating.
What a way to speak of the Royals!
The joining of countries
Reduced to a tumble!

And now, Geoff!
People are mistaking your "customs;"
Crediting them to similar Romans,
Pagan in thoughts and deeds;
Naked in the streets
Delivering pregnancy rites.
Those Corinthians would be mortified by our cupids:
Babies in Diapers, Indeed!
What a colossal mistake--
Equating the day with the gods.

How could You!
Those poor Worthy* martyrs
Consecrated by the Church.
Their feast day now celebrated
With sweets, chocolate, and edible underwear.
Your tales have carried
Until commercialism reigns,
And Saints' day resembles a pagan marriage
Dressed in blood-red and pink.
Oh Geoffrey! If you'd only known!
You'd be laughing.

Submitted on 2008-02-14 15:01:42     Terms of Service / Copyright Rules
Edit post

Rate This Submission

1: >_<
2: I dunno...
3: meh!
4: Pretty cool
5: Wow!


  I came here to return a favor, just looking to find one to comment upon, and happen to choose this. I love it. It just made me chuckle, and I learned a bit, too. I think it's the way you constructed it, as a conversation with "Geoff" that gives it that lightness, that makes it so much fun. I was thoroughly entertained. I find nothing to offer for improvement, I must and will FAV it.

| Posted on 2009-01-07 00:00:00 | by phil askew | [ Reply to This ]
  hehe this is nice, i don't think I've ever seen edible underwear mentioned in a poem that wasn't a total disaster of a poem. nice job, and i didn't know that valentine came from Latin for worthy, nice learning poem
PS thanks for the comment on No meaning anymore
| Posted on 2008-07-23 00:00:00 | by PryncessVynom | [ Reply to This ]
  Oh, I really loved this. It was so delightful. I also didn't know about the speaking of Chaucer at that wedding. I too learned something new today. For some reason, when reading it, I kept picturing Chaucer as portrayed in the movie A Knight's Tale. And really, it made it that much better to me. I would maybe have changed this line:

Your tales have carried

to this:

Your tales have been carried

other than that, I really enjoyed it.
| Posted on 2008-03-11 00:00:00 | by brokenmuse | [ Reply to This ]
  This is delightful! It is humorous, and tells an entertaining story! It's ok that the holiday celebration got a little confused; us guys are always looking for any excuse to celebrate and woo you lovely ladies!!
| Posted on 2008-03-04 00:00:00 | by Ron Cole | [ Reply to This ]
  I reqally enjoyed how this was a historical story and "correction" but in prose! I didn't know all of this so I also learned something new today! How true the last stanza!


love,peace,joy,abundance & smiles to share
| Posted on 2008-03-04 00:00:00 | by Epiphany | [ Reply to This ]

Think Feedback more than Compliments :: [ Guidelines ]

1. Be honest.
2. Try not to give only compliments.
3. How did it make you feel?
4. Why did it make you feel that way?
5. Which parts?
6. What distracted from the piece?
7. What was unclear?
8. What does it remind you of?
9. How could it be improved?
10. What would you have done differently?
11. What was your interpretation of it?
12. Does it feel original?