This site will self destruct in 2 months, March 17.
It will come back, and be familiar and at the same time completely different.
All content will be deleted. Backup anything important.
--- Staff
Roleplay Cloud -

Sign up to EliteSkills

Already have an account? Login to Roleplay.Cloud
Forgot password? Recover Password


Author: monad1
ASL Info:    70/M/California
Elite Ratio:    3.44 - 20 /14 /12
Words: 172
Class/Type: Random Thoughts /Legend
Total Views: 239
Average Vote:    No vote yet.
Bytes: 1265



Although we can personify beings with metaphysical prowess, (objectified manifest's dimensional delineations),can we touch others or even ourselves with these extrapolations? Is zoomorphic zoolatry's demagogueries on the social contiguity a proper solution. I mean how the clairaudience of astral projection. One would tend to think that proximity's parameter's opaque opulence would tend to take precedence over the exponentially extemporaneous nature of trajectory extant's physical location. It's the corporeally preternatural facts to exude when you consider the space it occupies. Noumenal sentience's semantics infer a spatiotemporal telemetry tactician. It's the identity crisis facts, and yet we conception feel an affinity for our surroundings. This might tend to implicate that the evolution of psychic clarity's mystic symbiotic's were irrefragably fecund. Ethology's entelechy to apotheosis élan vital's apotropaic. Transcendental accession's ascension is a translucent transpicuity. Retrospectively retroactive revision an inevitability. All that was will be forever and all that could be will become, not that this guarantees a positive outcome. We're fractal.

Submitted on 2022-03-06 08:09:46     Terms of Service / Copyright Rules
Edit post

Rate This Submission

1: >_<
2: I dunno...
3: meh!
4: Pretty cool
5: Wow!


  I suggest you're half right. The part, "all that could be will become", yeah, that's pretty solid.

You remember what happened the last time you invoked "Fecundity"... fecundity, fecundity, fecundity...

Processing magic. Many positive outcomes. Thanks!


| Posted on 2022-05-12 00:00:00 | by Blue Monk | [ Reply to This ]

Think Feedback more than Compliments :: [ Guidelines ]

1. Be honest.
2. Try not to give only compliments.
3. How did it make you feel?
4. Why did it make you feel that way?
5. Which parts?
6. What distracted from the piece?
7. What was unclear?
8. What does it remind you of?
9. How could it be improved?
10. What would you have done differently?
11. What was your interpretation of it?
12. Does it feel original?