This site will self destruct in 2 months, March 17. It will come back, and be familiar and at the same time completely different. All content will be deleted. Backup anything important. --- Staff
|
|
Starry nights Embrace the moment Pieces of eternity Open hearts Silvery circles Bound by fate Simply so Wishes made Fiery descents Enveloped with reverie Abstraction’s child Pools of thought Disappear in tomorrow Simply so Silent eyes Chasing after time Forever it seems Lucidly held In skyward glance Millions to delight Simply so |
i don't really feel an 'wholeness' to this piece. it seems to be begging for understanding, but it lacks the communication to make the connection. maybe that's just me. glad anyone else could understand this one. peace out. | Posted on 2006-03-13 00:00:00 | by ghostknight | [ Reply to This ] | I really like how you made this poem. Each line is like a separate story but then kinda goes together as a whole with the rest of the poem. I really like that and that its so simple and doesnt have any hidden meanings or symbols cause i'm never good at figuring that stuff out, lol. But i agree with fredmelden that "millions to delight" does seem a little out of place with the rest of your peom. But the rest of it was fine, i liked it. | | Posted on 2006-03-13 00:00:00 | by Faith_Disease | [ Reply to This ] | MMMmmmm I like what you did here. I'm a fan of linear poems, where each line tells its own tale, and can stand alone from the rest of the piece. | With that in mind, I'd keep "Simply so" simply seperate. The repetition is fine, just move it away from the statements. "In silvery circles" and "For fiery descent" you could drop the prepositiion to accent the statement the line makes, they're no necessary. so, simply "silver circles" and "fiery descents" very small things to pick on, and only my opinion, I loved your idea and execution be happy Graeme | Posted on 2006-03-11 00:00:00 | by wewak11 | [ Reply to This ] | "Millions to delight" seems out of place. Otherwise, a nice poem. Not particularly complex, nor demonstrative of great skill, yet very nice in its simplicity. However, your description is a bit misleading. There has obviously been some attempt at structural and meter consistency, which implies to me that you have a sensitivity to them both. Keep writing. I like what you've done here, and believe your skills will develop to a high level. | Nice work. fred | Posted on 2006-03-11 00:00:00 | by fredmelden | [ Reply to This ] | |